Every claim we make about data quality,
we measure first.

OpenDataLabs publishes research on AI training data quality, consented data collection, and the economics of human data licensing.

What we study

Consent rate benchmarks

What percentage of users share data, across which domains, in which integration contexts. Real numbers by data type and UX pattern. If you’re deciding whether to build a data-sharing flow, this is the data you need.

Contributor incentives and network sustainability

The economics of user data contribution at scale. Relevant for anyone building on a contributor network.

Portability and interoperability standards

How user data moves between systems without losing provenance. The standards question that AI teams, regulators, and platform operators will all have to answer.

Cross-domain enrichment effects

A contributor’s health data linked to their financial behaviour linked to their communication patterns tells you things none of those datasets tell you individually. We measure the performance uplift from multi-domain linkage and publish the methodology. That’s where ground truth data earns its price premium.

Data quality differentials: ground truth vs annotated vs synthetic

We measure the gap and publish the methodology. The difference matters most in health, finance, and language modelling. We quantify it.

Research collaborations.

We work with AI labs, universities, and enterprise data teams on applied research that needs ground truth data at scale. If your research requires that and you’re working on something that benefits the field, get in touch.